[1 was hosting Ant2 with SubVersion] > My first response was only about (2). As for (1), go for it! Just be > prepared to have some people watching our dev list, in case anything > comes up. (And you might as well wait for the Alpha release, of > course.) > > I guess also be prepared for a slightly greater inconvenience to > contributors. After all, they probably already have CVS clients > installed on their systems; now you're asking them to install this > other `svn' thing as well. It's not a huge burden, just something to > keep in mind.
Hmm... it could, however, be quite a change for those of us with great CVS integration in our IDEs. (I don't suppose there's a SubVersion Eclipse plug-in, is there? :) There's also the matter of the rest of jakarta - isn't it *all* done on CVS? How is SubVersion going to fit in with the other projects? I dare say that SubVersion is better than CVS in many respects, but keeping with a certain amount of uniformity has many benefits too. -0 on this one. I'd rather not, but I'm certainly not going to try to really put any roadblocks up. +1 for starting an Ant2 repository of *some* description. Jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
