Kai Bartels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are there plans to weaken this rule in the next release of Ant? > Maybe by inventing a 'overrule="true"' for the property task. Or > maybe by allowing lazy evaluation (lazy="true") for properties. All property resolution will be lazy in Ant2, so your problem should be solved there - and yes, there will be a built-in way to reassign the value of a property (you can already do that in Ant 1.x, but have to use a script or a custom task to do so). Stefan
- criticism: property handling (here: no overwrite) Kai Bartels
- Re: criticism: property handling (here: no overwri... Stefan Bodewig
- Re: criticism: property handling (here: no ove... Mikko Kurki-Suonio
- Re: criticism: property handling (here: no... Stefan Bodewig
- RE: criticism: property handling (here: no overwri... Christopher Berry
- Re: criticism: property handling (here: no ove... Stefan Bodewig
- RE: criticism: property handling (here: no... Conor MacNeill
- Re: criticism: property handling (here... Stefan Bodewig
- Re: criticism: property handling ... Peter Donald
- RE: criticism: property handling (here: no overwri... Christopher Berry
- Re: criticism: property handling (here: no overwri... Stefano Mancarella
- RE: criticism: property handling (here: no overwri... Mark Hewitt