Re: criticism: property handling (here: no overwrite)

[Stefan Bodewig]

Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It would be nice if the path didn't evaluate the fileset until it
> needed to supply the path so that paths based on jars in a fileset
> where the jars don't yet exist can be used (if you know what I mean)

You can do that now to a certain extent - just don't define the path
until the jars have been created.

For more than that, one would probably even need a way to refresh a
path after jars have been added or removed - I'm not sure I'd want to
go that far.

Stefan