After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves book "Java Development with Ant" I had chosen CruiseControl. They have written their views of the pro´s and con´s to each continous-integration-tool so you could make your own decision.
Jan Matčrne -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Nau, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet am: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 03:03 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump I have been assigned with setting up an integrated build process for all of our software components. The idea being to build each component working with the dependency tree in a top-to-bottom fashion. We currently have approximately 25 components which are currently being build individually with ant. Does anyone have any recommendations for this. My initial thought was to have a master build.xml file that calls into the component's build.xml. But after doing to investigation I came across a couple of tools that seem to be designed for this problem: AntHill, CruiseControl & Gump. Does anyone have any recommendations as to which one is better? Thanks, Mike.
