I am not the one you asked, but we use CC, too. It take me something about one day to set it up - including installing a JDK, Tomcat etc.
We do have a rather complicated project structure, though. > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 19:10 > An: Ant Users List > Betreff: Re: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump > > > How long did it get you to get it working? > > I am using anthill myself (against CVS) > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 22:11 > Subject: AW: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump > > > After reading the chapter in Eriks and Steves book "Java Development with > Ant" > I had chosen CruiseControl. They have written their views of the pro´s and > con´s > to each continous-integration-tool so you could make your own decision. > > Jan Matčrne > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Nau, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet am: Freitag, 10. Januar 2003 03:03 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: AntHill vs. CruiseControl vs. Gump > > I have been assigned with setting up an integrated build process for all > of our software components. The idea being to build each component > working with the dependency tree in a top-to-bottom fashion. We > currently have approximately 25 components which are currently being > build individually with ant. > > Does anyone have any recommendations for this. My initial thought was to > have a master build.xml file that calls into the component's build.xml. > But after doing to investigation I came across a couple of tools that > seem to be designed for this problem: AntHill, CruiseControl & Gump. > Does anyone have any recommendations as to which one is better? > > Thanks, > Mike. > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
