A bit of a correction here. They’re all one of these three (with the vast majority being in #1)
1. Victims of crime / fraud - and get to pay for all the security required to block it and to ensure that their customers remain secure + don’t abuse services 2. Victims of crime / fraud who can’t - or don’t want to - invest in such security 3. Other outfits that see a profit motive in providing services to abusers Still, they are part of a rather large and heavily abused ecosystem - called the Internet. —srs > On 06-Nov-2015, at 10:44 PM, Sascha Luck [ml] <a...@c4inet.net> wrote: > > Uhuh. I guess it's just as well that barely any operators seem to read > this list. They may be less than happy to learn that they are all > criminals.
