Hi Suresh
On 07/03/2016 13:19, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 07-Mar-2016, at 5:44 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.orei...@ucd.ie>
wrote:
I think Peter Koch, Gert Doering, and Gilles Massen have answered
this question adequately already.
Gert followed a rather socratic method - answering a question with
another :)
The current method is absolutely not useful in that the lack of
standardization means people (including me) who are stuck with large
amounts of phish to report have no other alternative but do a
substantial part of the process manually.
As I said in previous replies, abuse-c is standardised and is fully
deployed for RIPE NCC resources. You should not need to do any manual
lookups.
cheers
denis
—srs
Quoting Gert -
The relevant question for the PDP is "does 2016-01 help achieve the
goal of better combatting Internet abuse"?
[..]
I don't know why we are making the policy side so complicated.
The principle is simple. If you manage IP addresses in the public
domain, from where abuse can be generated, responsible management
requires you to provide abuse contact details!!!
Will making "providing a mail address in a specific field"
mandatory for people the RIPE NCC doesn't currently have a contract
with (and that do not particularily frequently show up on the "evil
boys list") help achieve your goals? Why?
