On 7 Mar 2016, at 11:30, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 07-Mar-2016, at 4:22 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.orei...@ucd.ie>
wrote:
When you work that one out they can apply the same principle to
"abuse-c:". Problem solved...
Pot, kettle, etc.
/Niall
It still leaves this question Denis posed unanswered
How do you propose the NCC does that?
Other than abuse-c and a record cleanup.
I’m glad to see various people step up and reject abuse-c but is
there a workable suggestion?
I think Peter Koch, Gert Doering, and Gilles Massen have answered
this question adequately already.
Best regards,
Niall
