On 07-Mar-2016, at 4:22 PM, Niall O'Reilly <niall.orei...@ucd.ie> wrote: > >> When you work that one out they can apply the same principle to "abuse-c:". >> Problem solved... > > Pot, kettle, etc. > /Niall
It still leaves this question Denis posed unanswered >> How do you propose the NCC does that? Other than abuse-c and a record cleanup. I’m glad to see various people step up and reject abuse-c but is there a workable suggestion? Or anything other than Sascha’s blanket dismissal of the entire aawg? —srs
