Justin C. Darby wrote:
Hi list,

Does anyone have interest in my spending time fully documenting our
vblade-based AoE configuration? Here are the basics:

Well you've almost done it writing this email--may as well finish it. :-)

Of note, though, is that we did have to bump the AoE buffer count
considerably in vblade to get the netxen clients performing well at

Details?

We also had to tune the heck out of the read ahead and page cache
system on the server, but thats more to do with 3ware controllers and
the small read requests vblade generates than vblade itself.

Ditto.

Offtopic pipe dream/note to the guys at Coraid: If you had one device
like the SR2461 that could do RAID 6+hot spares for the ultra
paranoid, had a web interface (internal or external to the box) for

I'll second the request for RAID6 on the SRXXXX models. I don't trust RAID5 with large arrays, and would really like to use RAID6. Actually, if the SR2461 and SR1561 could do RAID6, it would be pretty close to the ideal storage unit (for us). Don't care so much about the web interface though--but that's just me.


--
Jesse Becker
NHGRI Linux support (Digicon Contractor)

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Aoetools-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/aoetools-discuss

Reply via email to