Thanks Peter,

That all makes sense - I'll give it a go ASAP
(Currently using nsrewrite to achieve simple virtual hosting - but there are
a few issues)

regards,

Tim Moss
SiteSpeed Ltd
Mobile:         0 77 9613 4891
Email:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Website:        http://www.site-speed.com

This email contains information from SiteSpeed Ltd, which may be privileged
or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any
disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information
is prohibited. If you have received this electronic message in error, please
notify us immediately.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: AOLserver Discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
> Of Peter M. Jansson
> Sent: 15 January 2003 20:31
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [AOLSERVER] AOLserver 4: Virtual server fix
>
>
> On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 03:16 PM, Tim Moss wrote:
>
> > I'd hear that AOLserver 4 had host-based virtual hosting built into it.
> >
> > How do you actually configure this?
>
> More or less like this:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------Cut
> here--------------------------
> ns_section ns/modules
> ns_param        nssock          ${bindir}/nssock${ext}
>
> ns_section ns/module/nssock
> ns_param   port            $httpport
> ns_param   hostname        $hostname
> ns_param   address         $address
>
> ns_section "ns/servers"
> ns_param server1  "Some server"
> ns_param server2 "Some other server"
>
> ns_section ns/module/nssock/servers
> ns_param server1 www.server1.com
> ns_param server2 www.server2.com
>
> #
> # Note that the previous section is different from the sample config
> shipped
> # with AOLserver 4; by empirical methods, I realized that the sample is
> # incorrect -- it wants to put ":$httpport" after the host.  It would be
> nice if that worked,
> # but the code doesn't actually support it.  If you have a server
> listening on
> # more than one port, and you want servers with the same name but
> different
> # ports going to different servers, you're out of luck for now.
> #
>
> #
> # Now, one set of server configs per virtual...
> #
>
> ns_section "ns/server/server1"
> ns_param   pageroot        /usr/local/aolserver/servers/server1/pages
>
> ns_section "ns/server/server1/module/nslog"
> ns_param        file    "$logdir/access-server1.log"
>
> ns_section "ns/server/server1/modules"
> ns_param   nslog           ${bindir}/nslog${ext}
>
> ns_section "ns/server/server2"
> ns_param   pageroot        /usr/local/aolserver/servers/server1/pages
>
> ns_section "ns/server/server2/module/nslog"
> ns_param        file    "$logdir/access-server2.log"
>
> ns_section "ns/server/server2/modules"
> ns_param   nslog           ${bindir}/nslog${ext}
> ----------------------------------------------------------------Cut
> here--------------------------
>
> I left out some things, but most of those are no different from the 3x
> config.  Note that you load nssock on a global basis, not a per-module
> basis.  At the moment, it appears that nslog can only be loaded on a
> per-module basis, so you can't dump all the access log entries into one
> log file; that may or may not suit your taste, depending on how you run
> your railroad.
>
> Also, virtual server configuration appears static at the moment; as far as
> I can tell, you can't add servers to an AOLserver once it's completed
> initialization, so dynamic virtual hosting scenarios are not possible now.
>
> (At Primehost, we used to solve this by lumping a number of virtuals into
> one AOLserver instance, and tuning the number of virtuals to keep the
> server startup time fairly low; then we'd run as many instances as we
> could get away with on a box.  Some platforms could handle more instances
> with fewer virtuals per instance, and others were better at fewer
> instances with more virtuals per instance.)
>
> Pete.
>

Reply via email to