Not sure if it meets your distributed wiki requirements but technically any wiki attached to a github project can be used as a git repository itself, making it distributed and version controlled like your code.
https://github.com/blog/699-making-github-more-open-git-backed-wikis is a more complete description. Although thanks for the heads up re: fossil. Hadn't heard about it and will give it a gander. = ] -j On Nov 17, 2010, at 5:13 PM, Jeff Rogers wrote: Jade Rubick wrote: > Unless we hear otherwise, so far I think we can summarize this thread as: > Tom strongly dislikes github. > Several other people favor it. > The rest don't care or haven't spoken up yet. I'll toss in my 2 cents. For my recent projects I've begun to use fossil. It has a distributed wiki and bug tracker in addition to distributed source control. The command set is very simple, much simpler than git. There is no equivalent of github for fossil, but it doesn't need one; fossil includes its own web interface that runs as a cgi. The big win of fossil is that installation is simple; it's one executable that includes everything (command line tools, client, server, ...), and it works the same on unix and win32. It's not for everyone, but I highly suggest taking a look at it. And I wouldn't mind if aolserver started using it :) (I've been meaning to set up my own aolserver fossil repo, but I keep not finding the time to do so.) http://fossil-scm.org/ -J -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <lists...@listserv.aol.com> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank. -- AOLserver - http://www.aolserver.com/ To Remove yourself from this list, simply send an email to <lists...@listserv.aol.com> with the body of "SIGNOFF AOLSERVER" in the email message. You can leave the Subject: field of your email blank.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
