Tanmai Khanna <khanna.tan...@gmail.com>
čálii:

> Here's a timing test for weighted dictionaries.
> On apertium-eng-kaz:
>
> 1. 
> real 0m4.257s
> 2. 
> real 0m7.990s

With nob→nno plain lt-trim 1. takes 33s
whereas the long script in 2. takes 45s.

File size increases from 1.2M to 5.5M, seems acceptable (the unweighted,
untrimmed nob analyser is 2.1M).

However, I think it should be possible to do 2. nearly as quickly as
1. in pure lttoolbox (at least if tags are used instead of weights).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Apertium-stuff mailing list
Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff

Reply via email to