I have another question. In Polish "ich" can mean both "their" and "them". The tagger always chooses the "their" meaning, so I want to create a negative match, so that if the word is not followed by a noun, it would choose "them". I'm trying to put it together based on the documentation but I must be missing something. REMOVE ICH IF (0 ICH LINK NOT 1 NOUN); If this worked, it would tag the wordform as an inflected personal pronoun. What am I doing wrong? BestGreg We wtorek, 21 gru 2021 ô godzinie 17:59, Grzegorz Kulik ( gregorykku...@gmail.com) pisze: > Now I get it. Thank you very much! > > Best > Greg > > We wtorek, 21 gru 2021 ô godzinie 10:27, Daniel Swanson ( > awesomeevildu...@gmail.com) pisze: > > (1C NOUN) would match ^a/b<n>/c<n>$ or ^a/b<n>$ but it would not > > match^a/b<n>/c<adj>$ - you can read it as "if the next word can > > only be anoun". > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:10 AM Grzegorz Kulik < > > gregorykku...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you both for the suggestions. I never considered CG because > > > it looked complicated but I actually got a grip of it right away. > > > I went with: > > > REMOVE NOUN IF (0 DET) (0 NOUN) (1 (n mp)); > > > and it works perfectly. It did not work with 1C there. I looked > > > up the C symbol in the documentation and it says "Every reading > > > this position must match the pattern (normally only 1 has to)". I > > > don't know what this sentence means. Every time this position is > > > read, it must match the pattern? Can I find any elaboration on > > > this anywhere? I checked http://beta.visl.sdu.dk/cg3/single/ but > > > can't seem to find anything about it there. > > > Thank you!Greg > > > We wtorek, 21 gru 2021 ô godzinie 09:25, Hèctor Alòs i Font ( > > > hectora...@gmail.com) pisze: > > > > > > > > > Missatge de Daniel Swanson <awesomeevildu...@gmail.com> del dia > > > dt., 21 de des. 2021 a les 7:57: > > > Hi Greg, > > > The file where you want to write rules for this is > > > https://github.com/apertium/apertium-pol/blob/master/apertium-pol.pol.rlx > > > > > > If you want something like "tacy is <det> before <n>", you could > > > get that with > > > SELECT DET IF (0 DET) (0 NOUN) (1 NOUN) ; > > > > > > The problem with this rule is that (1 NOUN) is not necessarily a > > > noun, but something that can be analysed as a noun at the moment > > > this rule is executed. Similarly, the 0 word may be correctly > > > analysed as something else, like an adjective. So, a more > > > cautious rule can be, for instance: > > > REMOVE NOUN IF (0 DET) (0 NOUN) (1C NOUN) ; > > > The problem with this alternative variant of the rule is that it > > > matches less often than the first one. It may not solve cases > > > Daniel's version solve, although it probably makes less wrong > > > decisions. Your knowledge of the language, and testing on corpus, > > > should help you decide what is better, or maybe you will choose > > > something else in the middle. Tuning can be done adding a few > > > rules, previous to the general one, for often words/cases. > > > Hèctor > > > > > > > > > Daniel > > > On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 1:40 PM Grzegorz Kulik < > > > gregorykku...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello all, > > > > I haven't contacted you for some time, I hope you are all well. > > > > I developed the pol-szl pair and although the translation is > > > > quite reasonable, I decided to make it better by improving the > > > > lexical selection. I've been reading the documentation and > > > > managed to write several rules for forms that need > > > > disambiguation and are the same parts of speech. However, I > > > > cannot find any information anywhere about what to do if there > > > > is a form that can mean two completely different things. > > > > Example in Polish: > > > > tacy (such) = taki<det><dem><mp><pl><nom>tacy (of a tablet) = > > > > taca<n><f><sg><gen>/taca<n><f><sg><dat>/taca<n><f><sg><loc> > > > > The first meaning is obviously much more frequent but the > > > > translator chooses the second one, which is less than > > > > desirable. > > > > What can I do to remedy this? Can I write rules for that > > > > manually? Should I train the tagger? If so, what method would > > > > be the best? There's multiple training methods and I don't know > > > > which one to choose for my pair. Could you recommend me the > > > > best approach? > > > > Thank you in > > > > advanceGreg_______________________________________________Apert > > > > ium-stuff mailing listapertium-st...@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > > > > > > _______________________________________________Apertium-stuff > > > mailing listapertium-st...@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Apertium-stuff mailing list > > > Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________Apertium-stuff > > > mailing listapertium-st...@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > > > > _______________________________________________Apertium-stuff > > mailing listapertium-st...@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff > > _______________________________________________Apertium-stuff mailing > listapertium-st...@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
_______________________________________________ Apertium-stuff mailing list Apertium-stuff@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/apertium-stuff
