Philip M. Gollucci wrote: > Steve Hay wrote: >> Randy Kobes wrote: >>> Issac Goldstand wrote: >>>> Steve Hay wrote: >>>>> Issac Goldstand wrote: >>>>>> Vote results show only 2 +1s (issac,joes) and no -1s. >>>>>> >>>>>> We're still a +1 short of release. > > creating mod_apreq2.la > (cd .libs && rm -f mod_apreq2.la && ln -s ../mod_apreq2.la mod_apreq2.la) > make: don't know how to make all-local. Stop > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in libapreq2-2.11/module. > *** Error code 1 > > > So thats build errors on centos and FreeBSD -- yes, I used the tgz for > these > and not SVN. Anyway, I think joes traced most of this to issac having > rolled the tgz with ancient/old auto tools. Issac, want to try again > with a current set ? I'm in a position to give it a whirl too. > > Sorry I'm so slow. umteen jobs and all. > > P.S. I have no free weekends between now and March 20th. > >
Yeah, let's go for it. Since that's gonna be a vastly different tarball due to autotools and the windows resource that Randy mentioned, I'm all for calling 2.11 a dud and restarting with 2.12 I'll try to get to it later in the week, unless someone beats me to RM. Issac
