Bob Briscoe <i...@bobbriscoe.net> wrote: > > I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and interested implementers. > > We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires IETF, about L4S, > DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements.
This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF. It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and could benefit from formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and others. OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter can reasonably be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be split among existing WGs. However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely. -- John Leslie <j...@jlc.net> _______________________________________________ aqm mailing list aqm@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
