John,
On 19/02/16 18:23, John Leslie wrote:
Bob Briscoe <i...@bobbriscoe.net> wrote:
I'm cross-posting 'cos this impacts 3 IETF WGs and interested implementers.
We would like to propose a Bar BoF at the Buenos Aires IETF, about L4S,
DualQ and solutions to the TCP Prague Requirements.
This feels like it belongs as a non-WG-forming formal BoF.
It describes work spanning at least three WGs; and could benefit from
formal scheduling to avoid conflicts with those WGs and others.
OTOH, it really isn't to the point where a WG charter can reasonably
be drafted. First we must decide whether the work _can_ be split among
existing WGs.
However this may turn out, I wish to participate remotely.
OK, we'll see if the secretariat can help us with that.
Unfortunately we ran out of time for the formal BoF deadline on Friday.
Bob
--
John Leslie <j...@jlc.net>
_______________________________________________
tcpPrague mailing list
tcppra...@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpprague
--
________________________________________________________________
Bob Briscoe http://bobbriscoe.net/
_______________________________________________
aqm mailing list
aqm@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/aqm
