Glenn McCorkle wrote:
>
> On Tue, 09 Jan 2001 15:24:46 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:
>
> > One of us is confused. <G>
> > Did you rename QEMM's LOADHI to LH ?
> > Or do you not USE QEMM's loadhi ?
> > i.e. is there a better way ??
>
> when we use Qemm as memory manager, we then have 2 choices.
> 1) Qemm's "loadhi.com"
> 2) DOS's "LH"
> (aliases... "loadhigh" and "hiload" are both internal commands built
> into DR/OpenDos command.com)
>
> Don't believe everything you read in the documentation. ;-)
> According to this, LH won't work with "third-party" memory managers.
Good on YOU.<g>
But what about non-DR/OpenDOS users ?
The last question was: Is there a better way ?
So tell us. IS LH (with OpenDOS) better than QEMM's Loadhi ? (.sys and .com)
When using QEMM I have ALWAYS used loadhi instead of devicehigh and LH.
It wasn't a matter of being warned off by the documentation.
Why would they bother to write and include them if they aren't either
needed or useful ?
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
--
