OK - I'm convinced!   ;-)

I'll make the change; should happen in a day or two (I'm contemplating
adding some other "goodies", hence the slight delay ...)

Regards,
Joe.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clarence Verge [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 9 January 2001 11:56
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      Re: LSPPP made easy - update
> 
> Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 08 Jan 2001 15:04:19 -0500, Clarence Verge wrote:
> >
> > > What's wrong with:
> > > @lh lsppp.exe >>PPP.log ?
> >
> > > Doesn't it make sense to have some debug info available ?
> >
> > Good idea.
> > Let's see what it puts into PPP.LOG.......
> >
> > LADSoft PPP Packet Driver Ver 0.608 Copyright (c) LADSoft
> > Connecting to network...Negotiating IP linkage...
> > Connection open
> > Installed packet driver handler at vector 0x60
> > Status: IP address set to 207.17.248.23
> > _______________
> >
> > I like it!
> > That's a keeper.<g>
> >
> > However, as Joe pionted-out in another post....
> >
> > "lh" might not be compatible with all versions of DOS.
> >
> > So it would probably be best to leave it out of there by default.
> > Anyone who knows enough about DOS to think about "lh" will most likely
> > be doing other "tweaks" anyways and will add it at that time.<g>
> 
> Yup. That's like the universal boot disk maker.
> LH isn't what you want if you are using QEMM. ;-)
> 
> BTW Joe, the twirly bit is gone, and the output isn't voluminous unless
> you
> add the /l switch - in which case the EXTRA info goes directly to
> LSPPP.log.
> 
> -  Clarence Verge
> --
> -  Help stamp out FATWARE.  As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
> --

Reply via email to