On Sun, 13 Aug 2000 01:00:36 +0000, J. J. Young wrote: > L.D. Best wrote: >> I checked, and the problem is *not* with how Arachne handles the <pre> >> tag. The problem is that even though the < sign -should- brake the <PRE> tag, according to the rules, it doesnt do that in Netscape. My guess- another of those fixs for "nonsense that the designer do". Annoying, not according to the rules, but since its allready widly implemented..
- PRE tag error Or Botton
- Re: PRE tag error Jim Varnum
- Re: PRE tag error Glenn McCorkle
- Re: PRE tag error Bernie
- Re: PRE tag error L.D. Best
- Re: PRE tag error J. J. Young
- Re: PRE tag error Pete
- Re: PRE tag error Glenn McCorkle
- Re: PRE tag error Or Botton
- Re: PRE tag error Pete