On Sun, 24 Dec 2000 10:51:23 -0500 (EST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric S. Emerson) wrote: > Hi Sam, > I finally gave up the idea. I just run one computer > that I use on internet on WIN95-DOS. > I run another one on > MS-DOS 6.2. It's not a perfect solution but it was the easiest > solution. Hi Eric: I'm doing the same thing as you, but I will never get an the internet with my WIN95 computer unless I should really have a dire need to access a web page that is not compatible with Arachne or some other DOS browser. I'm very wary of security issues and am afraid of compromising myself and getting tracked and spammed and virus-infected, etc. I use WIN95 mainly for operating hardware such as scanners and some printers that are incompatible with DOS, and also for downloading images from my digital camera, also incompatible with DOS. <snip> > By the way, what's the name of the WIN manual you mentioned? Paul McFedries, "Windows 95 Unleashed, Professional Reference Edition", copyright 1997 by SAMS Publishing. BTW, this manual mentions some of the tricks Or Botton discussed in one of his recent posts. > Merry Christmas, > Eric Same to you, Eric. Have a Happy New Year too! Sam Heywood -- This mail sent by Arachne, www graphical browser for DOS -- Visit the Arachne DOS Browser Home Page, http://home.arachne.cz
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Eric S. Emerson
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... L.D. Best
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing wit... Thomas Mueller
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing... Ben Hood
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing... Steve Linux User
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Eric S. Emerson
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Glenn McCorkle
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Samuel W. Heywood
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Samuel W. Heywood
- Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Wi... Richard Menedetter
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing... Thomas Mueller
- Would this proposed workaround for dealing... Richard Menedetter
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for... Thomas Mueller
- Would this proposed workaround fo... Richard Menedetter
- Re: Would this proposed worka... Thomas Mueller
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing wit... Bernie
- Re: Would this proposed workaround for dealing with Win... Samuel W. Heywood