On Wed, 4 Dec 2002, Roger Turk wrote:
> Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:25:28 -0500 > From: Roger Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Majordomo results > > For some reason, skywalker is sending his mail directly to list members, not > thru the Arachne listserver. The headers that I get from skywalker show: > > . > From: "skywalker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > <005301c29ae9$786d9460$bb447ad5@procerus> > . > Subject: Re: Majordomo results > . > Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2002 09:26:07 +1300 > > Normally, the headers that I get will show: > > . > From: "Sam Ewalt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > . > Organization: > . > Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2002 09:06:40 -0500 > . > X-Mailer: Arachne V1.70;rev.3 > . > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > . > CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > . > Subject: Re: Majordomo results > Although the examples were not so relevant, I got the picture by studying the headers in question. Mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are simply forwarded to the list members, preserving the return-path field pointing to the original sender. You can trace the whole route of the original message. Mails sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are first copied somehow, and a copy originating from the arachne server is sent to the list members by a certain "smmp" program or module. The return-path points to [EMAIL PROTECTED] this time. This should not be an alias of the list, because in that case the bounced messages should loop like you told us below > Recently, a server for another listservice that I subscribe to went berserk. > Bounced messages were resent to the list and the messages that were bounced > were bounced once again and resent again and again. The owner of the list > was in Berkeley, California, and the server was in Texas. They finally had > to pull the plug on the server to get it to quit. > > Roger Turk > Tucson, Arizona > Best regards Cristian Burneci
