Sam, Give it up. You can't prove your god, or your good, even exist. You also lack the skill to truly debate -- instead picking on what you think is a weak spot (often out of context) and hoping to bury it by reiterating what you've said over and over before.
==== On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:33:31 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 20:41:01 -0400, L.D. Best wrote: > <snip> >> Judgments of right/wrong, immoral/amoral/moral can only be based upon >> the where/when/who/how ... > <snip> > This applies only to legal judgements based on the law and also to > judgements based on wishy-washy philosophies such as situational > ethics and moral relativism. Even those philosophies are commendable > as having some value. They are certainly of much greater worth than > no philosophy at all. They reflect a very good start for one who is > just beginning to examine his life. > Sam Heywood > -- > This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser: > http://browser.arachne.cz/ -- Arachne V1.71;UE01, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
