On 13/12/16 19:20, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2016-12-12 22:02, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >> I'm in favor of an auto build solution, since this has multiple >> bonusses. We could extend the auto build solution for reproducible >> builds (yay!). Auto rebuilds and maybe later when vendors get their act >> togehter (aarch64 *cough*). > > Creating a new or adapting existing solutions is time consuming. We > struggle to finish and switch to VCS-agnostic dbscripts for a long time > and I wouldn't expect that any automated build server will take less > time, not to mention security concerns expressed in previous > discussions. On the opposite, dropping support is effortless.
Given we can't get databases signed, I can't ever see an autobuild system working. A