+1 here as well. I don't test i686 either and I already have a few packages (emulation related) that are x86_64 only, either because they won't build on i686 without some fixes, or because upstream flat out dropped support for it.
Cheers, December 13, 2016 10:31 AM, "Allan McRae" <al...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On 13/12/16 19:20, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > >> On 2016-12-12 22:02, Jelle van der Waa wrote: >>> I'm in favor of an auto build solution, since this has multiple >>> bonusses. We could extend the auto build solution for reproducible >>> builds (yay!). Auto rebuilds and maybe later when vendors get their act >>> togehter (aarch64 *cough*). >> >> Creating a new or adapting existing solutions is time consuming. We >> struggle to finish and switch to VCS-agnostic dbscripts for a long time >> and I wouldn't expect that any automated build server will take less >> time, not to mention security concerns expressed in previous >> discussions. On the opposite, dropping support is effortless. > > Given we can't get databases signed, I can't ever see an autobuild > system working. > > A -- Maxime