One version of the answer to your question can be found here: https://ivanmiljenovic.wordpress.com/2010/03/15/repeat-after-me-cabal-is-not-a-package-manager/
On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Dawid Loubser <dawid.loub...@ibi.co.za>wrote: > Hi all, > > As a new user of arch-haskell, I would just like to put the question out > there: What is the point of arch-haskell, vs using cabal? Is it simply > for the elegance of using a single package manager (pacman) for all > packages on my system (Haskell-related and not) or is there some other > inherent problem I can expect down the line if I were to use the cabal > ecosystem? > > sorry if this is a redundant question - > Dawid Loubser > > _______________________________________________ > arch-haskell mailing list > arch-haskell@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell > >
_______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list arch-haskell@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
