On Sat, 2007-07-28 at 23:24 +0200, Jaroslaw Swierczynski wrote: > I'd say it's those packages' maintainers fault that they didn't make > up for pacman's bug ;) Seriously, pacman's versiom comparing functions > is buggy. Until it's fixed, such packages should be built with > force=y.
It's documented behaviour, it's not buggy. The package should have been built with 9.4.1P1 and then it would be fine. Pacman does weird things to underscores and lowercase alphanumeric version numbers, they're considered to be lower than normal version numbers. Using capitals, like in the samba package, works around this problem. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
