On 11/7/07, Antonio de la Rosa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > Since some time ago arch becomes rarely unstable distros. Even a half
> > year ago i don't afraid of pacman -Syu, now i sure that it breaks
> > something. I'm already switched to Fedora on some machines to get
> > stability, if arch continues going this way, it will lost many users
> > IMHO.
> Arch's updates are very simple if you compare with Fedora and rpm's
> hell. Arch is not mainteined for a enterprise how Fedora(Red Hat make
> many work in Fedora). For have a "stable" distro you need many resources
> and time. You need people that known very well the package and his code
> for apply patches and create backports. Is very difficult for a little
> distro for Arch. Is more simple and easy(KISS) use sources created for
> application's developers. Application's developers know his program
> better that a package maintainer i think...
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> arch@archlinux.org
> http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>


1) I know about Arch-Way.

2)  Arch starts to accelerate developing process and growing up
repositories, however Devs/TUs count aren't growing - this way it becomes
more and more unstable.
 Arch can be small but stable instead of big and unusable, since we have
limited numbers of Devs.

4) Pacman developers do strange things deaning DB-backends and continue to
develop ugly and very slow plaintext DB.

5) As i write above, arch devs now are growing up arch repos, but dependency
problem still not resolved - e.g. most of resent problems can't be exists in
rpm distros since it updates will be deny by package manager.

6) Fedora is not enterprise and there is no rpm-hell since fedora used yum.
yum+rpm even more simple to manage packages than pacman. And it's FASTER
than pacman!

7) I don't understand pacman devs - Bash pacman equal works only 10% slower
than C pacman!
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to