On 11/7/07, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, November 7, 2007 22:00, Zhukov Pavel wrote: > > It's like a beryl developing way - increasing features without > > stabilization. After some time 30% of features unusable, other works > > unstable, upgrade breaks anything. > > > > Lastest 'pacman -Syu' breaks something _every_time_! > > Nonsense. Either you don't Syu very frequently or you don't maintain your > system properly. > > So even if hypothetically things are as doom and gloom as you say, I > havn't been seeing your name on the bug tracker. Thus, I don't know what > you mean by 'we' in the your question. > > > Why we can't keep small, and usable distro, which can be safety updated? > > James > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >
I maintain some packages in community. Sorry, of course community it is't official part of Arch, and TU's should stay trouble with packages alone.
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
