Obviously, check if that class is available and where it is referred from
in the code. As I remember, there isn't a package called "ntaskint", so
check where this is coming from.

Cheers,
Anjana.


On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Ishan Jayawardena <is...@wso2.com> wrote:

> We developed the quartz task manager and we are currently working on the
> ntask task manager. While developing the task handling component that uses
> ntask, we observed that we cannot schedule a task in it due to a class not
> found error. See the below error message. The ntask component (which is
> used by the component that we are currently writing) cannot load the actual
> task implementation. Does anyone know how to get rid of this?
>
> java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: class org.wso2.carbon.ntaskint.core.Task
>  at
> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClassInternal(BundleLoader.java:501)
>  at
> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:421)
> at
> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.loader.BundleLoader.findClass(BundleLoader.java:412)
>  at
> org.eclipse.osgi.internal.baseadaptor.DefaultClassLoader.loadClass(DefaultClassLoader.java:107)
>  at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:247)
> at
> org.wso2.carbon.ntask.core.impl.TaskQuartzJobAdapter.execute(TaskQuartzJobAdapter.java:58)
>  at org.quartz.core.JobRunShell.run(JobRunShell.java:213)
> at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439)
>  at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
>  at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
> at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:895)
>  at
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:918)
>  at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
> Thanks,
> Ishan.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Anjana Fernando <anj...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> Task Server is actually another server itself. NTask component is the
>> task scheduling component we put to all our Carbon server when we need
>> distributed task scheduling functionality. That component support
>> scheduling tasks in a standalone manner (in a single server), or in a
>> clustered mode for the distributed nature (it does the coordination using
>> Hazelcast), or else, also a "remote" mode where it can interface with an
>> external Task Server.
>>
>> So basically the full required functionality of distributed tasks can be
>> achieved with the ntask component working in the clustered mode, where it
>> identifies all the participating servers in the cluster and do the proper
>> fail-over/load balanced scheduling of scheduled tasks. And they schedule
>> the tasks themselves using their internal Quartz functionality. With TS,
>> all the task triggering is offloaded to TS, where it will be sending HTTP
>> messages to each server saying to execute the tasks. This should happen
>> through the LB as I explained in the earlier mail.
>>
>> So basically Task Server = ntask component + remote tasks component. What
>> any other Carbon server will need is just the ntask component for full task
>> scheduling functionality.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Anjana.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Paul Fremantle <p...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Can someone clarify? I'm lost but I really don't understand why we are
>>> creating any other approach than task server. It is the only approach that
>>> scales clearly. Is our task server code too heavyweight?
>>>
>>> Paul
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2014 08:47, Chanaka Fernando <chana...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Kasun/Anjana,
>>>>
>>>> I think what Anjana mentioned and Ishan mentioned are somewhat converge
>>>> to same idea (even though they looks different).
>>>>
>>>> What we have discussed and agreed was that we are developing a separate
>>>> carbon-component which is used for executing the ntask component. Since we
>>>> need a common interface to support both the existing quartz based
>>>> synapse-tasks implementation and the ntask component, we have defined the
>>>> TaskManager interface.
>>>>
>>>> When ESB is loading the synapse configuration, it will create an object
>>>> of type TaskManager according to the Task provider mentioned in the
>>>> configuration. This task manager object will delegate the scheduling and
>>>> other task related stuff to the respective implementation of the
>>>> TaskManager (which can be either QuartzTaskManager or NTaskManager).
>>>>
>>>> @Kasun/Anjana: are we missing something here?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Chanaka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <ka...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Anjana Fernando <anj...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ishan,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 7:33 AM, Ishan Jayawardena <is...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Currently, we have developed following design and started to work on
>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Synapse will have defined the TaskManager, and Task interfaces whose
>>>>>>> implementations will provide the concrete tasks and management of those
>>>>>>> tasks depending on the scheduler(ie quartz or ntask).
>>>>>>> For instance, for inbuilt quartz based task scheduling, we
>>>>>>> will refactor and develop a quartz task manager, and a task type while
>>>>>>> maintaining the compatibility with existing tasks.
>>>>>>> Additionally, we are developing an ntask based task manager.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We will introduce the following new element to synapse.xml that
>>>>>>> provides the class name of the TaskManager implementation so that 
>>>>>>> Synapse
>>>>>>> can create a single task manger object when it starts up.
>>>>>>> <definitions xmlns="http://ws.apache.org/ns/synapse";>
>>>>>>>     <taskExecutor
>>>>>>> provider="org.apache.synapse.task.NTaskTaskManager"/>
>>>>>>> </definitions>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I guess the NTask based task manager implementation should have a
>>>>>> WSO2 package name, since it is a WSO2 specific implementation, and
>>>>>> something you will not ship with Synapse.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly.
>>>>> I've mentioned this several times in our offline discussions as well..
>>>>>  Why are putting a dependency from synapse to a WSO2 component? Again...
>>>>> have a look at how we have integrated synapse registry with WSO2 registry.
>>>>> This must be implemented as a carbon component.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Anjana.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The class name of the Task implementation can be obtained at the
>>>>>>> time the user adds a new task through the UI. By using that class
>>>>>>> name, Synapse can create the task object, initialize it and hand it 
>>>>>>> over to
>>>>>>> the task manager instance to schedule.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Ishan.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Isuru Udana <isu...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Sagara Gunathunga <sag...@wso2.com
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Kasun Indrasiri 
>>>>>>>>> <ka...@wso2.com>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I would like to clarify the objective of this task:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - Introduce the concept of a Task provider in to ESB. Which means
>>>>>>>>>> any existing task (task config) can be ran on the available task 
>>>>>>>>>> provider(
>>>>>>>>>> this can be ntask, quartz or anything)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  Is this means we continue to support Quartz as well ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yes. Idea is to introduce an interface at the synapse level which
>>>>>>>> providers can implement. Quartz based implementation is one of the 
>>>>>>>> possible
>>>>>>>> task provider implementation.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> IMO for simple use cases it's important to continue support for
>>>>>>>>> Quartz  while Task server may fit into complex use cases.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> - However, the recipes concept is completely transparent at
>>>>>>>>>> Synapse level. Simply we don't have to thing about recipes when 
>>>>>>>>>> doing this.
>>>>>>>>>> Recipe(or Dish) can be consider as a place where specific logic is 
>>>>>>>>>> executed
>>>>>>>>>> on top of generic task.
>>>>>>>>>> - All the details on sequence deployment, template invocation is
>>>>>>>>>> not related to ESB task provider concept.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:36 AM, Ishan Jayawardena <
>>>>>>>>>> is...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am working on $subject to support scheduled invocation of
>>>>>>>>>>> recipes in the ESB. This mainly includes replacing the existing 
>>>>>>>>>>> quartz
>>>>>>>>>>> based task scheduler with ntask scheduler. The new task type is 
>>>>>>>>>>> based on
>>>>>>>>>>> ntask, and it will be added as a new component in the mediation 
>>>>>>>>>>> category.
>>>>>>>>>>> We can use the existing task management UI of the ESB to add and 
>>>>>>>>>>> manage
>>>>>>>>>>> tasks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> In addition to the task schedule information, template name and
>>>>>>>>>>> template parameter values, a special property must be added to the 
>>>>>>>>>>> task
>>>>>>>>>>> parameter list at the time of task creation so that the task can 
>>>>>>>>>>> invoke the
>>>>>>>>>>> template within its execute method.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The task,
>>>>>>>>>>>      reads properties and builds a synapse sequence by inserting
>>>>>>>>>>> the recipe template in it,
>>>>>>>>>>>      deploys the sequence into synapse,
>>>>>>>>>>>      injects a message to the above sequence to invoke the
>>>>>>>>>>> template.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Ishan.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Ishan Jayawardena
>>>>>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (77) 408 2330
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Kasun Indrasiri
>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect
>>>>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> cell: +94 77 556 5206
>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Sagara Gunathunga
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Senior Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>>> V.P Apache Web Services;    http://ws.apache.org/
>>>>>>>>> Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
>>>>>>>>> Blog ;  http://ssagara.blogspot.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> *Isuru Udana*
>>>>>>>>  Senior
>>>>>>>> * Software Engineer*
>>>>>>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>>>> email: isu...@wso2.com cell: +94 77 3791887
>>>>>>>> blog: http://mytecheye.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/isudana
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ishan Jayawardena
>>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer
>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (77) 408 2330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Anjana Fernando*
>>>>>> Technical Lead
>>>>>> WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
>>>>>> lean . enterprise . middleware
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Kasun Indrasiri
>>>>> Software Architect
>>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>>>>
>>>>> cell: +94 77 556 5206
>>>>> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Chanaka Fernando
>>>>
>>>> Technical Lead
>>>> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>> lean.enterprise.middleware
>>>>
>>>> mobile: +94 773337238
>>>> Blog : http://soatutorials.blogspot.com
>>>> LinkedIn:http://www.linkedin.com/pub/chanaka-fernando/19/a20/5b0
>>>> Twitter:https://twitter.com/chanakaudaya
>>>> Wordpress:http://chanakaudaya.wordpress.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Paul Fremantle
>>> CTO and Co-Founder, WSO2
>>> OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair, Apache Member
>>>
>>> UK: +44 207 096 0336
>>> US: +1 646 595 7614
>>>
>>> blog: http://pzf.fremantle.org
>>> twitter.com/pzfreo
>>> p...@wso2.com
>>>
>>> wso2.com Lean Enterprise Middleware
>>>
>>> Disclaimer: This communication may contain privileged or other
>>> confidential information and is intended exclusively for the addressee/s.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient/s, or believe that you may have
>>> received this communication in error, please reply to the sender indicating
>>> that fact and delete the copy you received and in addition, you should not
>>> print, copy, retransmit, disseminate, or otherwise use the information
>>> contained in this communication. Internet communications cannot be
>>> guaranteed to be timely, secure, error or virus-free. The sender does not
>>> accept liability for any errors or omissions.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> *Anjana Fernando*
>> Technical Lead
>> WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
>> lean . enterprise . middleware
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ishan Jayawardena
> Senior Software Engineer
> Mobile: +94 (77) 408 2330
>



-- 
*Anjana Fernando*
Technical Lead
WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com
lean . enterprise . middleware
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to