On Mar 22, 2014, at 11:08 AM, Milton L Mueller <muel...@syr.edu> wrote: > ... > The key point of contrast between the proposals is the role of ICANN. The I* > leaders are proposing to eliminate the accountability function that the IANA > contract with NTIA brought with it, allowing ICANN to simply absorb them > because it is presumably more "mature" and well-behaved than it was, say, 10 > years ago. Our proposal calls for structural separation of the DNS-related > IANA and root zone maintenance functions, which has better accountability and > transparency features.
Milton - I would not characterize it quite as you did (i.e. "proposing to eliminate the accountability function that the IANA contract with NTIA brought"), particularly since the position clearly states "ICANN will engage with the Internet community in a bottom-up public consultation process to ensure appropriate accountability mechanisms" Your characterization: "eliminate the accountability" The actual statement: "ensure appropriate accountability mechanisms" It is true that the I* leader statement did _not_ include specific mechanisms for accountability, as it was felt that was the type of matter to be discussed among the Internet community. My apologies if this did not come through as clear as it might otherwise have, and for any confusion that may have resulted. > Whatever one's view, the RIRs need to have a broader discussion of these > issues among their members. A few staff members should not be allowed to > speak for the RIR community as a whole. Further, the Commerce Department will > require an open and consensual process before it will approve a transition > plan In the case of ARIN, the ARIN Board of Trustees was consulted to confirm that the statement was an appropriate position with which to start the dialogue with the ARIN community. The ARIN announcement notes that "In the ARIN community, these discussions will take place via the communication and discussion channels already in place, including the upcoming ARIN 33 meeting in Chicago this April. ARIN will continue to facilitate discussion and ensure that the output is effectively channeled into the global process." We look forward to robust discussion on these matters at ARIN 33 next month in Chicago, and I do appreciate you highlighting the importance of this topic to the ARIN community. There is little doubt that the proposed transition, while helpful from the perspective of completed a long-awaited transition, also has the potential for significant changes in the ecosystem in which ARIN's mission is performed and therefore should be a topic of significant interest to the ARIN community. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.