On Monday, June 30, 2014, John Curran <[email protected]> wrote: > On Jun 30, 2014, at 6:58 PM, Martin Hannigan <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > Objection, with the majority of the community from the previous ARIN > meeting, recent NANOG PPC and other comments and fora discussion. > > > > But don't let that stop the ARIN AC from moving it forward in its > obsession with controlling v4 markets. > > Martin - > > The policy in question would be applied both with respect to allocations > from the > regional free pool as well as during specified transfers for those > seeking to use the > MDN policy for their basis of need. > > It would be helpful to the discussion if you could elaborate on your > views on how the > addition of the proposed policy language would result in unfair and/or > technically > unsound administration of number resources. > > Thanks! > /John
John, See the multiple event transcripts. We'covered this ground. No need to waste bits. If you, or the AC, disagrees feel free to tear my opinion apart with the myriad of facts you undoubtedly possess. :) Let's simply agree that the ARIN AC doesn't represent all of our view points effectively and see what happens? Best, Martin
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
