On 12/04/2014 10:53, John Curran wrote: > On Dec 4, 2014, at 1:12 PM, William Herrin <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 10:59 AM, John Curran <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >> > Actually, the terms regarding indemnification and warrant disclaimer >> are nearly >> > identical to that contained in the other RIR's RPKI agreements; are >> those also >> > problematic, or is the difficultly that principally that ARIN >> agreeing to the >> > terms explicit rather than implicit? >> >> Hi John, >> >> I've seen a lot of hand waving, but I still have no clue how the >> publication of RPKI data places ARIN at a different risk than >> publication of registration data via whois. > > Bill - > > Parties are likely to use RPKI services such that (as someone put > it recently) - "routing decisions are affected and breakage happens” > > While such impacts could happen with whois,
I know of at least one major ISP that derives its routing filters from the (non-RPKI) IRR data, including ARIN's IRR. If your route disappears from the IRR, you don't get routed. I don't they they're the only ones who do this. It certainly wouldn't surprise me if folks used whois in a similar manner. ARIN probably has a third-party indemnification clause for its IRR also, no? _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List ([email protected]). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact [email protected] if you experience any issues.
