On Jun 3, 2015, at 1:33 PM, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org> wrote: > > On the contrary John, I (of course) place great value legal frameworks, > however I strongly believe that such legal frameworks must be created to > allow for the entities operating within that framework to perform the > functions for which they were created. > > It is unfortunate ARIN appears to view such functions as secondary to the > legal framework (I seem to recall a similar situation with regards to ARIN's > requirements to testing RPKI, but I'm sure I must be mistaken).
David -
You obviously feel very strongly about this topic, but I haven’t been able
to
discern what you feel ARIN or the ARIN community should being doing in
this respect.
If I understand your view on the matter, you are concerned that current ARIN
registry policy as developed by this community results in “registry
inaccuracy”
(as noted, I disagree with that premise but we’ll use your terminology for
now)
I don’t think that you are advocating for ARIN not to follow the community-
developed policy (although you were not quite clear when directly asked
that)
Note that there are not many other options -
1) Are you simply strongly advocating that community on this mailing list
should
change the registry policy such that there is no needs-basis for
transfers?
2) Alternatively, do you believe that the community should not have been
allowed
to establish any policy for transfers, as registry policy has
historically been with
respect to the allocation/assignment role of the registry, and the
ongoing role of
registry administration and maintenance should not have any applicable
policy?
If the latter (#2), would that belief mean that there should also be no
policy setting
a minimum block size for transfers or required contact information, etc?
There is
some manner in which you feel that ARIN has cast aside proper registry
functioning,
and I am trying understand if it is consternation with the ARIN community
over their
policy choices or a structural belief regarding the application of
registry policy.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
