Good day, PPML! First, as the primary shepherd for ARIN-2017-5, I want to thank everybody for the spirited discussion on this proposal. It's generated a lot of good feedback for the AC to take under consideration as we develop the text.
Based on the community feedback, as well as internal dialog, I'm going to remove the IPv4 requirements from the draft policy proposal. I'll have a new version of the draft text posted to the ARIN website once I'm finished with the edits and it's approved internally. It would still be very useful to understand if there's majority community support for specific nibble boundaries for the IPv6 cut-off. The boundaries at /60, /56, and /48 have all been discussed. If one is more favorable than the other, and you would like to see the proposal edited to use that one, we will certainly take that under advisory. Thanks, Leif Sawyer ARIN Advisory Council. _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
