I agree,

The change ARIN did was nothing but fair and reasonable.
I don't think that ARIN should feel "peer pressure" to do something that
other RIRs do.
Keep in mind that RIPE LIRs got 3 options, each (pay more, pay more or pay
more) so they understandably chose to pay more.
In my personal opinion, they should rather cut spending on non-essential
services such as RIPE Atlas.

Kind Regards,
Dominik








śr., 24 lip 2024 o 17:56 Fernando Frediani <fhfredi...@gmail.com>
napisał(a):

> Hi
>
> I will fill the survey on the link, but wanted to feed this discussion and
> hear what others think.
>
> ASN maintenance fee for what exactlly ? What justifies charge something
> separate just for the ASN ? What do you do with a ASN without other
> numbering resources ?
>
> In my view ARIN did the right thing and simplified it merging into the
> membership fee. Just keep it simple.
>
> Regards
> Fernando
>
>
> On Wed, 24 Jul 2024, 12:41 Nachiket Kondhalkar via ARIN-PPML, <
> arin-ppml@arin.net> wrote:
>
>> Hello ARIN Policy community,
>>
>>
>>
>> APNIC and RIPE NCC have introduced an annual ASN maintenance fee from
>> January 2025. As part of a research group currently studying AS Number
>> management at TU Delft, we would like to understand the perspectives of
>> network administrators in reference to this change. Your experience and
>> expertise will help us understand and present the consensus of the
>> community through our research.
>>
>>
>>
>> ARIN has previously introduced ASN maintenance fees, but merged those
>> fees into membership fees a couple of years ago. We would really value your
>> perspective regarding this issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> The link for the survey is :
>> https://tudelft.fra1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_6DzjvsCOXjto8R0
>>
>>
>>
>> For more information about the study:
>> https://blog.apnic.net/2024/07/16/a-comprehensive-review-of-rir-policies-in-the-domain-of-asn-management/
>>
>>
>>
>> We would be grateful if you could take a few minutes to complete the
>> survey. Your participation will help develop solutions for network
>> operators.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thank you for your time and your input,
>>
>> Nachiket Kondhalkar
>>
>> TU Delft
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ARIN-PPML
>> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
>> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
>> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
>> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
>> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>>
> _______________________________________________
> ARIN-PPML
> You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
> the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
> Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
> https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
> Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
>
_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to
the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net).
Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at:
https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.

Reply via email to