2017-06-21 13:00 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net>: > .On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 9:35 AM, mike.v...@gmail.com > <mike.v...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2017-06-17 11:17 GMT+02:00 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net>: >>> On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 8:40 PM, mike.v...@gmail.com >>> <mike.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> i knoow... btw can you possibly investigate why, when you hit >>> "reply", the ">"s are not added? >> >> I was using gmail in HTML mode, apparently. I've found a switch. >> Hopefully this works better. > > it does. yay! For those wonder how. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDP3VcmsYtg >>> in a stack you tell the factory what thicknesses you want, as well as >>> what material in between, and what thickness of that, too. so you get > >> So it doesn't have to be a problem. As long as you control the layers >> that have traces have the same thicknesses. > > technically correct but far too much risk and hassle. you end up > tying the PCB layout to a specific PCB manufacturing factory. Hmm. If only we could include parameterised sections in the design to accommodate that. > > l. > > _______________________________________________ > arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk > http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook > Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk _______________________________________________ arm-netbook mailing list arm-netbook@lists.phcomp.co.uk http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/arm-netbook Send large attachments to arm-netb...@files.phcomp.co.uk