That still avoids my distinction between rhetoric and policy. on 9/5/03 3:45 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 9/4/03 11:03:22 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > here I have to disagree with you Steve. :) The Republican party's ideology > runs from classical liberal to national socialist, while the Democratic > party's ideology runs from national socialist to international socialist. The > Republican party may not be very good at implementing the classical liberal > ideology of some of it's members, but the Democratic party has no such > ideology to > implement. Most of the family values, incidently, don't involve government > action so much as simply trying to turn back the tide of anti-Christian > sentiment > which rolls off the television night after night, consistently portraying > serious Christians as evil oppressors. I was sitting next to Dan Quayle one > might > back in Iowa when a social conservative who fits your profile tried to get > Quayle to support government censorship of the entertainment media and Quayle > very firmly opposed government censorship or content regulation of any sort.
