I think that today there is a unified macro (Bill recognized that saying
there wasn't was going out on a limb). Macro is now in a period of
"normal science." The profession has decided that the corect way to do
macro is using a stochastic dynamic general equilibrium model. Some
people include sticky prices in such models and others do not but either
approach is well within the mainstream. Also, almost all the profession
will now also agree that sticky prices or not a large fraction of what
we call business cycles are the natural responses of an economy to real
shocks.
Although stagflation opened the door to new ideas what has driven
the process more than anything is the internal dynamic to make macro
models more micro-based.
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel. 703-993-2314
Web Page: http://mason.gmu.edu/~atabarro/
and
Director of Research
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA, 94621
Tel. 510-632-1366
- Re: Questions about the stagflation episode... William Dickens
- Re: Questions about the stagflation episode... fabio guillermo rojas
- Advise to Journalists Alex Tabarrok
- Advise to Journalists Alex Tabarrok
- Re: Advise to Journalists Arthur G. Woolf
- Re: Advise to Journalists john hull
- Re: Advise to Journalists Dan Lewis
- Re: Advise to Journalists Anton Sherwood
- Re: Advise to Journalists Chris Rasch
- Re: Advise to Journalists George Berger
- Re: Advise to Journalists john hull
- Re: Advise to Journalists Anton Sherwood
- Re: Advise to Journalists: keep it ... Fred Foldvary