:-) :-) 
   
  Hi Shah Navas
  Thank you for posting replies... I'd even forgotton that I had written 
'feelings or observations' .  It was about midnight when I wrote the message 
and forgot to mention (as we all know) that Journals are on subscriptions, need 
editors plus reviewers and so on.  But from the posts in the group I note that 
the members are very knowledgeable so it didn't matter if I missed a few things 
related to Journals.  
  Neena

Shah Navas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
          Oh no... I did not reply to that 'feeling or observation'. It was 
purely instinctive.  :)

  On Jan 31, 2008 9:52 PM, Shah Navas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  Great Idea Neena and a very thoughtful one too. Hope this reaches ARR or he 
already has this mind.    
  

  On Jan 31, 2008 5:35 AM, neena kochhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
            
    "Neena and Raghu: I think above, I answered your interests and concerns 
regarding the request to start our own journal on ARR's music. Yes, Gops is 
already doing so much for this group and we can't ask any more of him. I think 
we just need to organize our resources already flowing through this forum and 
make them easily available and accessible to the thousands of fans who are a 
part of this group. I'm sure that would be something we can do fairly easily".


  Dear Dasum
   
  First of all I woud like to thank you for reading my e-mail and responding to 
it.  Many a times I've posted but I observed and felt that no one ever reads my 
mails since generally there was no response to them although the same thread by 
some else was responded to.  Oh no, now I am not complaining but as I just 
mentioned it is a mere observation and feeling.
   
  Secondly, I was off to a very important work meeting just after I replied to 
the e-mail about the journal.  Let me clarify - I still believe that producing 
a Journal of music is a fantastic idea.  Since ARR is opening the School ( I 
reiterate, I prefer the term Academy) of music, he (ARR) (or others working 
with him) could perhaps get in touch with a publisher who would be willing to 
publish this Journal (monthly like other journals).  It will have articles on 
music and in that a section of readers letters which could include articles 
like your e-mail that many have responded to.  The Journal would be on the line 
of for example:
   
  Journal of Experimental psychology
  Journal of Indoor Air
  Journal of Food Science and Technology
  and so on
   
  Its like Acedemia (ARR music School) and Publications going hand in hand.
   
  In this Journal (which could also be available on line - e-Journal).... 
   
  Various people in the music industry both in India and Abroad would 
contribute articles which will give insight to various aspects of music....
   
  It would have latest newsrelated to the music circle, e.g. technology and 
software developments....
   
  It would include a jobs section that could advertise jobs and this section 
would generate revenue....
   
  It will have other general advertiement section, e.g music shops, intrument 
rpair shops... again to generate income.....
   
  It would include information on seminars and lectures, workshops etc on music 
which people could attend free and /or by payment depending upon the nature of 
the talks...
   
  Poepe would of course have to buy the journal which again will generate 
income.  He is an international figure and I am confident that people outside 
India would read and subscribe to the journal.
   
  I don't expect any one in this group to write this journal but I just 
wondered and wanted that perhaps those who are close to ARR suggest it to ARR 
and let him decide.  His Music school is no mean feat and documentation 
survives the test of times.  A journal on these lines will/could immortalise 
the teachings and open door to musical knowledge.
   
  Perhaps I am being naive here but as I not in India I don't know if such 
journals already exist and if they do how well do they do.
   
  I hope what I have written makes more sense now after this brief explanation 
above.  
   
  Keep up the good work.
   
  Regards
   
  Neena
     
   
  

Dasun Abeysekera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    
        Dear Rahmaniacs,

First of all, let me say I'm humbled by all the wonderful responses you have 
sent. I have saved each and every one of them and thought I'd use one email to 
respond to all of you.

Anand: Yes, being in touch with your own spirit and its connectivity to all of 
life is the key to reaching higher consciousness - it is really about 
self-awareness. There is so much beauty to be experienced at each higher level 
and we need profound minds like Mozart and ARR, who push us subconsciously 
through their music and Einstein and Tolstoy, who illuminate the true nature of 
our universe and humanity to help us reach those levels consciously.

Dinesh: I will try to post some of my feelings on ARR and his music in the 
future as and when I find the time. I have always been grateful to Gopal and 
this forum, which when I joined had less than 200 fans, for giving me the 
opportunity to share the wealth of feelings that ARR had inculcated in me 
through his music first, then through his personality and thoughts. I'm happy 
to have woken you up from your slumber: as Kailash Kher says - Jaago! :)

Padmini: The song I analyzed was Uyirum Neeye and not Kehna Hai Kya. Since 
there are so many new members here, I will re-post it. Perhaps, I need to load 
articles like these in a shared location in the group so that fans can read it 
at their leisure. I would love to have Swapnil's musical reviews in one place 
if possible too. As I always experience at work, good ideas just come and go 
because we don't store them in anything else, but emails, which are really hard 
to manage.

Neena and Raghu: I think above, I answered your interests and concerns 
regarding the request to start our own journal on ARR's music. Yes, Gops is 
already doing so much for this group and we can't ask any more of him. I think 
we just need to organize our resources already flowing through this forum and 
make them easily available and accessible to the thousands of fans who are a 
part of this group. I'm sure that would be something we can do fairly easily.

Gomzy: I think your point is fair regarding the lack of originality, but I used 
the word in the sense of innovativativeness more than genuineness. I doubt I 
will ever have to question ARR's sincerity.

Siraj, Suresh, Krishna Kumar, Vithur, Chord, Avinash, Shanavas, Durbha and all: 
thank you again for your kind comments, they'll help me stay motivated to write 
more of these, and before that, finish this one! :)

Like some director once said (forget who exactly it was), ARR is like an 
ocean..so calm and so deep. If we can explore how much creativity is conjured 
up by him in those moments of spontaneous revelation, which I feel is what he 
experiences, we can grow a little deeper than we are now, achieve a little more 
awareness of ourselves and the world around us. If I can help in that quest by 
writing these articles, then that will be my gift to ARR.

Take care and thanks again,
Dasun


    
---------------------------------
  To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 12:41:40 +0000
Subject: [arr] Re: ARR's Standard Deviation - Part II - Aesthetic Judgment

      So well and rightly said. It was a sheer bliss reading your write-up! 
Thank you so much for this wonderul post.

--- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, Dasun Abeysekera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
wrote:
>
> 
> Aesthetic Judgment (Taste)
> 
> I don't have to tell you that ARR's taste is of the highest 
possible kind compared with composers of all time. I mean how many 
composers the world-over has ever had the privilege of being compared 
to the ideal of Mozart, let alone being called one? Not even the 
kings of melody of the West – Richard Rogers (of The Sound of Music 
(59) fame) Sir Francis Lai (Love Story (1970)), Maurice Jarr (Dr. 
Zhivago (1965)), or even Ennio Morricone, who have written some of 
the most soulful and moving music I have ever heard, have been told 
they are like Mozart, at least not to my knowledge. Most music 
lovers, and all great minds, Leo Tolstoy and Albert Einstein among 
them, have acknowledged unanimously that Mozart's music is the most 
perfect and the most universal imagined, no, let me use the word 
conjured, by any human being; because imagination, to many, could 
still mean there's some conscious involvement in that process of 
creation; perhaps, it is still a conscious process, but it is a far 
superior sense of consciousness that, by average human standards, it 
cannot be called one. If anybody here has seen the Oscar-winning 
movie Amadeus (84) by Milos Forman, you can see why it is so: 
Mozart's music, to use a phrase Einstein once used, seems like have 
simply been `plucked out of the universe'; the great scientist who 
adored Mozart and used to play his Sonatas on his little violin when 
he wanted a break from his scientific pursuits, says that compared to 
Mozart, Beethoven's music feels `too personal, almost naked.' 
Tolstoy, in his polemical book `What is Art?' destroys the kind of 
conscious creativity that he believes Beethoven and the followers of 
the Romantic movement that he charted, Richard Wagner, for example, 
brought about to Europe, overthrowing the musical dominance of the 
spontaneous and universal music of Mozart.
> 
> In essence, Mozart's music and its perfection are not a result of 
conscious processing, they come from a superior sense of natural 
harmony and an extremely rare capability of letting go of one's self 
and connecting with the universal spirit and listening to it in all 
its infinite beauty. There cannot be a more fitting description of 
ARR's music and how he has conjured his magical output over the 
years; and it is no accident that the West would offer up their ideal 
for comparison with the best the East has offered to date. That sort 
of taste, a sincere kinship with the natural harmony and beauty of 
the universe, with God, if you will, years in an industry cannot fade 
away or dilute, and, if anything, I can confidently say that ARR's 
taste has, over the years, been refined like fine old wine, and I 
have not witnessed an instance where his aesthetic judgment, given 
the proper opportunities, has faltered beyond identification. In his 
choice of movies, directors, and lyrics, there maybe exceptions, but 
I will address these in a later category.
> 
> It is difficult to pin down one or two works from the 92-96 period 
in which, like Rano said, beauty oozed out of every single phrase 
that he weaved, but I will pick two of my favorite songs `Kannalane' 
from Bombay (95) and `Uyirum Neeye' from Pavitra (94) in which I 
think ARR achieves the highest form of perfection. Sometime back, I 
analyzed the beauty of the song Uyirum Neeye from a conceptual 
viewpoint, so if anybody is interested, let me know and I will send 
it to you or post it on the forum. Kannalane (or Kehna Hai Kya), I 
hear, has entered the music textbooks in certain parts of the world 
(Canada, if I recall correctly)! Yes, these are songs of superior 
beauty that they have that universal appeal that Tolstoy hailed as 
the finest ingredient of the greatest of art. 
> 
> What about now? What are the ARR compositions within the past 5 
years which evoke the same feelings in me? Piya Ho from Water (2005) 
and Do Kadam from Meenaxi (2004) for sure are my favorites from this 
period with Tere Bina from Guru not too far off. When I refer to the 
perfection of these songs, I mean that I don't feel that I need to 
remove any part, any phrase, any instrument, sound or note, 
everything is in the right place at the right time! If anybody felt 
differently about these songs, I would be curious to know which parts 
destroy the perfection of these songs. I can write an essay on the 
song Do Kadam and will do soon so that I can back up my feelings just 
like I did with Uyirum Neeye. Do Kadam is so personal for me that I 
don't want to hold it up as universal! This song symbolizes what ARR 
and I share in silence without speaking a single word with each-
other, but by connecting to the same universal spirit that we both 
trust wholeheartedly and by whose mysterious ways we are awed day in 
and day out. The highest taste, as Immanuel Kant defines it, is 
always subjective, but universal, and it will always flow from God 
and only God; Not only is ARR connected with Him, he can articulate 
His beauty with such ease and finesse that it brings many a tear to 
my eye thinking how much of my faith I owe to ARR; Even as I share 
this very personal story with you, I can feel a warm tear roll down 
my cheek. Now if that's not beauty, I don't know what is.
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________
> Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging. You 
IM, we give.
> http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join
>






  
---------------------------------
  Connect and share in new ways with Windows Live. Get it now!   





  
  
---------------------------------
  Sent from Yahoo! - a smarter inbox. 









  

                         

       
---------------------------------
 Sent from Yahoo! &#45; a smarter inbox.

Reply via email to