Using a singer's voice is a music directors choice thats why ARR is music director and Sonu is a singer in their respective professionals.
I love Sonu's voice so let me start from here.I don;t know Chord's comment is correct or wrong but its his opinion and you may agree or disagree. If its a less experienced singer woudnt have commented like that so Sonu being an experienced singer and has a lot of respect to ARR which was my understanding and why would he adddress the media stating his voice not utlised is something wrong with his attitude or its a HOAX information, or just a media speculation.but pls note : A fan or audience who buy that album can comment how the song and singer has sung it but a singer who gets paid cannot comment why he is not utilised. I personnaly feel its just not a singer's business. now I kinda understand where Chord's comments are coming from. ARR want to be perfect wwanted to have Sonu's voice even if its just a harmony. e.g. Guzarish has sonu's voice just as a guest vocal. well, I think the media speculation so far is Sonu is being very generous on this coz hedoesnt do these guest vocals normally. again its just IMO. --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, V S Rawat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 11/16/2008 6:54 PM India Time, _Chord_ wrote: > > > If what is said was actually true, it's only an ego issue, nothing more. > > If it is ego, it is not his ego but your ego that makes you deaf to any > comment on ARR that is not even adverse. > > And such type of attitude here I find sickening. > > Sonu is a polite person, he doesn't make odd comments. ARR has used him > wisely and brilliantly in several great songs (qismat se tum...). Sonu > is capable and hardworking, and he has every right to say if he wanted > to give better. I think it is a great comment of him that when we are > all finding shano and mastam great songs, even then sonu himself feel > that he could have done better. It is not an adverse comment on ARR. > > -- > Rawat >
