In many cases, the songs are streamed online via official sites like Raaga, Bollywood Hungama or Galatta. Wonder why and how you forget that part!
I've no issues in arguing/ debating this - my conscience is clear. But yes, if its gets petty, personal and half-baked (like your argument here), I'd rather stay out. Karthik --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "satish_srini" <satish_sr...@...> wrote: > > I am with Suresh on this matter. Since you run a popular website criticizing > filmmakers and composers for being unethical, it is expected that you > practice what you preach. Correct me if I am wrong, but I am sure that you do > not buy all the albums that you review in your blog, especially the ones that > you dismiss casually by the words NSFW. In such a case, do you think that it > is ethical to review something that you do not own? > > Satish > > Note: My comments have nothing to do with your review of VTV and this is > something that was in my mind for a long time. This is the price that you > have to pay for being popular!!! > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "inetk" <6times9@> wrote: > > > > Thanks Suresh, for those completely unwarranted kind words. > > > > Downloading illegal music - bad. Purchasing CDs - good. Download is done as > > a matter of ease of distribution/ availability. Purchasing CD once it > > releases - done as a matter of policy. > > > > I'm touched by your concern, but. Nice way of going personal over a review. > > > > Karthik > > > > --- In arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com, "sureshmechnit" <sureshmechnit@> wrote: > > > > > > If you are a regular reader of that site, you must have known by this > > > time that he has always reviewed the albums after listening tocheap > > > quality illegally downloaded songs - once. All the preaching gyaans about > > > "anti-Plagiarism, being ethical and legal" are only for others. > > > > > > It has become such a normal thing, that it is okay to comment on a public > > > platform about something that you don't even own yet. > > >
