Thanks,
Do you mean several threads on the server, or several treads from the
client? I has a import program doing this, but will rewrite it to
support multiple threads.
--
Jarl
On 2/8/07, Ben Chernys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This only has effect if you are running multiple threads. Further, the real
use is to not place a lock on arschema so the effects will not be noticed until
you have workflow creating multiple records firing simultaenously across
multiple threads (possibly in different orders and timings).
Example:
Thread 1 Thread 2
cre XXX cre YYY
wait 1s cre XXX
cre YYY wait 1s
cre XXX cre XXX
Cheers
Ben
>----- ------- Original Message ------- -----
>From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jarl_Gr=F8neng?=
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
>Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:33:03
>
>Hi,
>
>
>Has anyone notice any incrase in performance
>setting
>Next-ID-Block-Size to a value higher than 2?
>
>Tried setting this up to 1000, but does not notice
>any increase in
>create operation.
>
>--
>Jarl
>
>___________________________________________________
>____________________________
>UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at
>www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers
Are"
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers
Are"
