Thanks, Do you mean several threads on the server, or several treads from the client? I has a import program doing this, but will rewrite it to support multiple threads.
-- Jarl On 2/8/07, Ben Chernys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This only has effect if you are running multiple threads. Further, the real use is to not place a lock on arschema so the effects will not be noticed until you have workflow creating multiple records firing simultaenously across multiple threads (possibly in different orders and timings). Example: Thread 1 Thread 2 cre XXX cre YYY wait 1s cre XXX cre YYY wait 1s cre XXX cre XXX Cheers Ben >----- ------- Original Message ------- ----- >From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jarl_Gr=F8neng?= ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG >Sent: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:33:03 > >Hi, > > >Has anyone notice any incrase in performance >setting >Next-ID-Block-Size to a value higher than 2? > >Tried setting this up to 1000, but does not notice >any increase in >create operation. > >-- >Jarl > >___________________________________________________ >____________________________ >UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at >www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
_______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"