Neel Guatam wrote:
Ian Trimnell gave a defect ID in initial post - SW00271676. However, I
can't seem to find that defect on BMC's support-site. Can anyone see
that defect number on their site?

I don't know why we can't see this defect on BMC's site, if anyone out there from BMC can shed light on this then that would be useful. I seem to remember in the old days we could look up a defect by it's number - not now :-(

However, I can access the detailsvia the 'Defects/RFEs/CARs' tab in the Issue information. It states:

Information for         SW00271676
Summary         Email notifications are being sent out twice randomly
Details         1. DROP/BUILD BUG OCCURS IN (IF PRE-RELEASE)
ARS 7.0.1
Email Engine 7.0.1 Patch 003
Windows Server 2003
outlook 2003
Exchange server 2003

2. STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
Configure email engine with MAPI or SMTP.
Create Outlook Profile for user which is configured in Email engine configuration form.
Send Email to the users using Email Engine Message Form.
It will send random duplicate emails.
In Email Engine Message form it shows only one outgoing message but in outlook it recieves duplicate messages.

3. ACTUAL RESULTS:
Sending duplicate email.

4. EXPECTED RESULTS:
should not send duplicate email.

5. BUSINESS IMPACT:
HIGH

6. ADDITIONAL INFO:

I have re-produced this problem with MAPI and SMTP both. It is showing that some messages are getting duplicated randomly.

The rest of the information is blank apart from the 'Type' field which has a value of "Product". Oh yes, the timestamp on Issue is 13/07/2007 05:39:09.

Hope this all helps.

Ian

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ian Trimnell, AR System Lead Developer (amongst other jobs),
Specialist Support & Information Team, Academic & Administrative Computing Service
Open University, MILTON KEYNES, UK
Phone: 01908 653741   web: http://www.open.ac.uk/

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers 
Are"

Reply via email to