Did I miss a post ont this? I have been running 7.1 in production for several 
weeks and haven’t noticed any instability. The bug list below is interesting 
but not exacly showstopper stuff. Is there something else I should be prepared 
for?

 

ENV:

 

ARS 7.1

Windows 2003

Oracle 10g

MT 7.1 on Solaris

 

Chris

 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of patrick zandi
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:25 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 Patch 1

 

** 

Rick, 

You know how things go.. I'll bet the Q&A guy said no.. and so did the team, 
but someone higher in the food chain who knows better said get it out.

I have seen alot of that.

 

On 11/28/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

I'm just wondering - would spending more time in analysis have gotten 7.1.0
to a more stable state at present than it is now?  I know hindsight is 
20-20, but breaking things that hadn't been broken before is consistent with
a recent trend that I hope to see reversed soon as engineering practices
mature within BMC.

Rick

-----Original Message----- 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:21 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 Patch 1

Some of the issues fixed in patch 1:
SW00275797      The arf file will be reloaded if accessed from ARTask.
SW00276623      When the User Tool connects to an older version of the 
server (6.3 or 7.0.1) it updates (or re-caches) the arf or afv file each
time a form is opened.
SW00277616      Each time a table is refreshed, the source form of the
table field is re-cached resulting in poor performance when opening forms 
having table fields.

--
Jarl

On Nov 28, 2007 1:05 AM, Joe D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> **
>
> Listers,
>
> I vaguely remember reading experiences of some users who dived into 
> installing Patch 001 for ARS 7.1, that they experienced caching
> issues? Can someone please confirm what I heard? What I think I
> remember reading is that the User Tool downloads the def files every 
> time a user logs onto the Remedy User tool and opens a form,
> irrespective of whether or not there is a change on the def file
associated to the form that the user opens.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> Joe D'Souza
> Remedy Developer / Consultant,
> Shyle Networks,
> New Jersey.
> Cell: +1.732.331.5004
> Desk: +1.732.698.7275
>
>   __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with 
> HTML in it___

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: 
www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"




-- 
Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with 
HTML in it___ 

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to