There are some substantial performance issues, apart from other bugs.  If
you search the ARSList archives for posts from Chris Strauss, you will get
more details.

Rick

On 11/28/07, Christopher Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did I miss a post ont this? I have been running 7.1 in production for
> several weeks and haven't noticed any instability. The bug list below is
> interesting but not exacly showstopper stuff. Is there something else I
> should be prepared for?
>
>
>
> ENV:
>
>
>
> ARS 7.1
>
> Windows 2003
>
> Oracle 10g
>
> MT 7.1 on Solaris
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of patrick zandi
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 9:25 AM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 Patch 1
>
>
>
> **
>
> Rick,
>
> You know how things go.. I'll bet the Q&A guy said no.. and so did the
> team, but someone higher in the food chain who knows better said get it out.
>
> I have seen alot of that.
>
>
>
> On 11/28/07, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm just wondering - would spending more time in analysis have gotten
> 7.1.0
> to a more stable state at present than it is now?  I know hindsight is
> 20-20, but breaking things that hadn't been broken before is consistent
> with
> a recent trend that I hope to see reversed soon as engineering practices
> mature within BMC.
>
> Rick
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 10:21 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: ARS 7.1 Patch 1
>
> Some of the issues fixed in patch 1:
> SW00275797      The arf file will be reloaded if accessed from ARTask.
> SW00276623      When the User Tool connects to an older version of the
> server (6.3 or 7.0.1) it updates (or re-caches) the arf or afv file each
> time a form is opened.
> SW00277616      Each time a table is refreshed, the source form of the
> table field is re-cached resulting in poor performance when opening forms
> having table fields.
>
> --
> Jarl
>
> On Nov 28, 2007 1:05 AM, Joe D'Souza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > **
> >
> > Listers,
> >
> > I vaguely remember reading experiences of some users who dived into
> > installing Patch 001 for ARS 7.1, that they experienced caching
> > issues? Can someone please confirm what I heard? What I think I
> > remember reading is that the User Tool downloads the def files every
> > time a user logs onto the Remedy User tool and opens a form,
> > irrespective of whether or not there is a change on the def file
> associated to the form that the user opens.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > Joe D'Souza
> > Remedy Developer / Consultant,
> > Shyle Networks,
> > New Jersey.
> > Cell: +1.732.331.5004
> > Desk: +1.732.698.7275
> >
> >   __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with
> > HTML in it___
>
>
> ____________________________________________________________________________
> ___
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
> Sponsor:
> www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>
>
>
>
> --
> Patrick Zandi __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted
> with HTML in it___
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
> Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to