About 750 users ..... dba reckons there's nothing to be done at that end, but to be honest I can't see it being a database issue. Its the fact that the same task, performed at the same time, at two different locations, has a mahoosive difference in time taken. And yes, new hardware is coming in "soon", but I'm just trying to get information to further investigate the problems, I get a feeling it'll still happen on the new hardware, just maybe not so pronounced. Regards
Dave -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Howard Richter Sent: 26 June 2008 15:19 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Remedy - sensitive to network performance? ** There are sooooo many reasons for slow responce other then networks, however as William said, we need more info. To add to his list, is ther a difference between the client and web? How many users? Has your dba looked at the database and the server its runing on? Have you turned on logging? Lots and lots of questions, Hbr On 6/26/08, William Rentfrow < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can you give us more information about your setup? Database type, server OS, web server type, etc? I assume you are using 1 AR Server connected to a local (relative to the server) database. You did not mention whether or not you are using the Web or Windows clients either. William Rentfrow Principal Consultant, StrataCom [EMAIL PROTECTED] O 952-432-0227 C 701-306-6157 ________________________________ From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Barber, David Sent: Thu 6/26/2008 8:11 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Remedy - sensitive to network performance? ** Hi, Has anyone experienced end-user performance problems with Remedy over larger networks? We're running a suite of bespoke applications, and are finding that some tasks such as opening/updating incidents can take orders of magnitude longer in some locations. For example it can take me 8 seconds, but a colleague at another location 2 or 3 minutes. Have been able to do some local benchmarks - typical ping responses are circa 10ms, but at points when we find that even our performance is hit, we find the network is responding to pings at maybe 60+ms. Our network guys invariably say that the network is running fine ... So it appears that Remedy, or at least the applications we're running, are incredibly sensitive to network performance. Any suggestions from the list as to what we can do to improve performance? Regards Dave This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless e-mail security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive managed e-mail security service, visit http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/ The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, copy, disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in this email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender (whose contact details are above) immediately by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. Cable and Wireless plc Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525 Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" -- Howard Richter Red Hat Certified Technician CompTIA Linux+ Certified ITIL Foundation Certified E-Mail = [EMAIL PROTECTED] LinkedIn Profile = http://www.linkedin.com/in/hbr4270 __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless e-mail security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive managed e-mail security service, visit http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/ The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, copy, disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in this email. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender (whose contact details are above) immediately by reply e-mail and delete the message and any attachments without retaining any copies. Cable and Wireless plc Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525 Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
