Shyam,
 
I think the question for us is whether going Oracle RAC will give us 
scalability.  From what Conny said it sounds as if we'd probably have a 
performance drop, as we are primarily read/write/modify.
 
I've discussed this with our DBA, and he's done some investigation, and it 
turns out that Remedy is not truly Oracle RAC aware.  This could also explain 
why I've had one of the developers ask if I've seen anything about Remedy 7.5 
(hoping that its RAC aware???).
 
Ta
 
Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Shyam Attavar
Sent: 14 November 2008 07:05
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Load Balanced Remedy -> Load Balanced Oracle environments?


** 
We are also running Oracle 10gR2 (RAC) on a RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) 
cluster with three nodes. Not sure if this directly equates as Load Balanced 
Oracle environment. We have been on this setup for over a year and we have not 
seen any real issues so far. 
HTH
--
Shyam

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Barber,  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> David 
Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:59 AM
Subject: Load Balanced Remedy -> Load Balanced Oracle environments?

** 

Been asked an intriguing question. 

Our current Remedy environment : 

- Hardware load balancer 
- 2 x ARS 7.0.1 Remedy servers running on Solaris 
- 1 x Oracle database server running on Solaris 

Looking to the future and scaling the application, we're looking at load 
balanced Oracle solutions (I've heard about an Oracle RAC - real application 
cluster?), and our DBA has stated that Remedy will not work against an Oracle 
RAC in a load balanced mode.

Anyone on the list have experience of running Remedy against a load balanced 
Oracle cluster?  Any case studies, or information to share?


Regards 

Dave Barber 


This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless e-mail 
security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive 
managed e-mail security service, visit http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/ 

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be 
subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, copy, 
disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in this email. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender (whose contact 
details are above) immediately by reply e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments without retaining any copies.

Cable and Wireless plc 
Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525 
Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ
__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ 


This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by the Cable & Wireless e-mail 
security system - powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive 
managed e-mail security service, visit http://www.cw.com/uk/emailprotection/ 

The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may also be 
subject to legal privilege. It is intended only for the recipient(s) named 
above. If you are not named above as a recipient, you must not read, copy, 
disclose, forward or otherwise use the information contained in this email. If 
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender (whose contact 
details are above) immediately by reply e-mail and delete the message and any 
attachments without retaining any copies.
 
Cable and Wireless plc 
Registered in England and Wales.Company Number 238525 
Registered office: 3rd Floor, 26 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4HQ

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to