Another reason to write/construct you own solution and follow best practices in 
naming conventions/documentation/etc.
Been doing Remedy for 13+ years, logical naming of objects is important - 
Custom or OTB.

Oh the days of Remedy - Your Business, Your Way! 

Doug Tanner

Gidd how about you, how does ESS standardize naming conventions?
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Taylor
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:50 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks

I don't think so.  They will support the applications out of the box.  They 
won't support customizations.  If you break something with your customizations, 
they are not obligated to help you figure out how you broke it.  They might, 
but they might not.  They are also not necessarily obligated to help you 
understand their workflow, unless it relates to a documented integration point. 
 Many of the whitepapers they provide are nice, but not strictly necessary.

Understand that I would love it if BMC documented their systems better.  I just 
don't think that the statement that it is necessary that they document their 
naming conventions, or the implied statement that they should document other 
implementation details, is correct.  It would be great if they did, but they 
are under no obligation to do so.

Lyle

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of David.M Clark
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:36 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks

I think that paying for support says otherwise... except for that "easy"
part.

David M Clark
Remedy Programmer/Analyst


>>> Lyle Taylor <tayl...@ldschurch.org> 3/24/2009 10:06 AM >>>
Strictly speaking, ITSM is BMC's product, and they are under no
obligation to provide us with any of the nitty-gritty details about how
their application was written including any naming conventions used
internally, etc.  The fact that BMC allows you to customize the product
doesn't mean they need to support you in that effort or to make it easy
for you.

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Coleman, Gavin
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:56 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG 
Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks

**
"In my opinion, ITSP followed some best naming conventions."

Well considering that as far as know the naming convention is not
explained anywhere in the ITSP or ITSM documentation, I can't see how
you can believe that. Remedy allows you up to 80 characters to name
workflow items, and it seems that ITSP and ITSM does not use all of
these characters. My Active Link workflow has a naming convention as
follows


 1.  Prefix for custom work (CC_)
 2.  Form abbreviation (NIM:) - New Incident Console
 3.  Execute on abbreviation (MRC - Menu Row Choice, Btn - Button, WL -
Window Loaded). If more than one Execute on is specified, then the
abbreviation I use is the most relevant
 4.  Name of Button, Table, Field etc (E.g. Btn_OpenIncidentTask)
 5.  Execution Order (-000-)
 6.  Details of Actions (OpenHelpDesk)

Thus, we get

CC_NIM:Btn_OpenIncidentTask-000-OpenHelpDesk

If an AL or Filter is part of a Guide, then the suffix _GUIDE is
applied. If the AL or Filter calls a Guide, then the suffix _CallGuide
is applied.

I'm sure other people have naming conventions, but if you are providing
a product that is to be released to the general public, then surely
publishing the naming convention in your documentation is ESSENTIAL.

Just my £0.02 worth!


Gavin Coleman
Senior Analyst/Programmer
Computacenter (UK) Ltd
Services & Solutions
Hatfield Avenue
Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9TW, United Kingdom
T: +44 (0) 1707 631662
E: gavin.cole...@computacenter.com 
W: www.computacenter.com 


**********************************************************************

COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the
registered number 03110569. Its registered office is at Hatfield
Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW

COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the
registered number 01584718. Its registered office is at Hatfield
Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW

COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in England and Wales
with the registered number 3434654. Its registered office is at Hatfield
Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW

COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the
registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business
Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW



The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only.

It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be
privileged.

Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for
the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone
else.

If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then
destroy it.

Computacenter information is available from:
http://www.computacenter.com 

**********************************************************************
__Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distri
bution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.



_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org 
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message.



DISCLAIMER Important! This message is intended for the above named person(s) 
only and is CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. If you are not the intended recipient 
of this e-mail and have received it in error, please immediately notify the 
sender by return email and then delete it from your mailbox. This message may 
be protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine.  
Accessing, copying, disseminating or re-using any of the information contained 
in this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly 
prohibited. Finally, you should check this email and any attachments for the 
presence of viruses, as the sender accepts no liability for any damage caused 
by any virus transmitted by this email.  Thank you.

Reply via email to