One more comment on this topic: Something BMC should do is put help text on their OOTB application fields. I really don't know why they don't do it.
-Guillaume -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) on behalf of Tanner, Doug Sent: Tue 03/24/09 11:57 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks Another reason to write/construct you own solution and follow best practices in naming conventions/documentation/etc. Been doing Remedy for 13+ years, logical naming of objects is important - Custom or OTB. Oh the days of Remedy - Your Business, Your Way! Doug Tanner Gidd how about you, how does ESS standardize naming conventions? -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Lyle Taylor Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 11:50 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks I don't think so. They will support the applications out of the box. They won't support customizations. If you break something with your customizations, they are not obligated to help you figure out how you broke it. They might, but they might not. They are also not necessarily obligated to help you understand their workflow, unless it relates to a documented integration point. Many of the whitepapers they provide are nice, but not strictly necessary. Understand that I would love it if BMC documented their systems better. I just don't think that the statement that it is necessary that they document their naming conventions, or the implied statement that they should document other implementation details, is correct. It would be great if they did, but they are under no obligation to do so. Lyle -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of David.M Clark Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 9:36 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks I think that paying for support says otherwise... except for that "easy" part. David M Clark Remedy Programmer/Analyst >>> Lyle Taylor <tayl...@ldschurch.org> 3/24/2009 10:06 AM >>> Strictly speaking, ITSM is BMC's product, and they are under no obligation to provide us with any of the nitty-gritty details about how their application was written including any naming conventions used internally, etc. The fact that BMC allows you to customize the product doesn't mean they need to support you in that effort or to make it easy for you. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Coleman, Gavin Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 3:56 AM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: ITSM naming convention sucks ** "In my opinion, ITSP followed some best naming conventions." Well considering that as far as know the naming convention is not explained anywhere in the ITSP or ITSM documentation, I can't see how you can believe that. Remedy allows you up to 80 characters to name workflow items, and it seems that ITSP and ITSM does not use all of these characters. My Active Link workflow has a naming convention as follows 1. Prefix for custom work (CC_) 2. Form abbreviation (NIM:) - New Incident Console 3. Execute on abbreviation (MRC - Menu Row Choice, Btn - Button, WL - Window Loaded). If more than one Execute on is specified, then the abbreviation I use is the most relevant 4. Name of Button, Table, Field etc (E.g. Btn_OpenIncidentTask) 5. Execution Order (-000-) 6. Details of Actions (OpenHelpDesk) Thus, we get CC_NIM:Btn_OpenIncidentTask-000-OpenHelpDesk If an AL or Filter is part of a Guide, then the suffix _GUIDE is applied. If the AL or Filter calls a Guide, then the suffix _CallGuide is applied. I'm sure other people have naming conventions, but if you are providing a product that is to be released to the general public, then surely publishing the naming convention in your documentation is ESSENTIAL. Just my £0.02 worth! Gavin Coleman Senior Analyst/Programmer Computacenter (UK) Ltd Services & Solutions Hatfield Avenue Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9TW, United Kingdom T: +44 (0) 1707 631662 E: gavin.cole...@computacenter.com W: www.computacenter.com ********************************************************************** COMPUTACENTER PLC is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 03110569. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (UK) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 01584718. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (Mid-Market) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 3434654. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW COMPUTACENTER (FMS) Limited is registered in England and Wales with the registered number 3798091. Its registered office is at Hatfield Business Park, Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire AL10 9TW The contents of this email are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information which may be confidential and which may also be privileged. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive mail for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you receive it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it. Computacenter information is available from: http://www.computacenter.com ********************************************************************** __Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___ NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distri bution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. DISCLAIMER Important! This message is intended for the above named person(s) only and is CONFIDENTIAL AND PROPRIETARY. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail and have received it in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and then delete it from your mailbox. This message may be protected by the attorney-client privilege and/or work product doctrine. Accessing, copying, disseminating or re-using any of the information contained in this e-mail by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. Finally, you should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses, as the sender accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. Thank you. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: RMI Solutions ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
